Theoretical and practical propositions for more sustainable livestock production

Main Article Content

Jose Nahed Toral
Valdivieso-Pérez I.A.
Grande-Cano, D.

Abstract

Abstract


A brief review is made of theoretical and practical propositions for more sustainable livestock production (meat and milk). An Organic Livestock Conversion Index (OLCI) was developed to evaluate the level of approximation of Livestock Production Units (LPU) to the organic model. Organic practices such as crop rotation, use of cover crops, mechanical and manual weed control, and recycling of manure reduce soil erosion and pest problems and generally allow for avoiding the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, which - along with the substitution of nitrogen fertilizer with legumes and/or manure – reduces energy use in organic systems. Furthermore, practices by LPU contribute to sustainable livestock production by means of minimal use of chemical fertilizers in pastures; adding nutrients to the soil solely by cattle depositing manure during grazing, manual weed control, use of silvopastoral systems, and energy efficiency by the farmers. The approximation of the LPU to organic production, the use of organic practices, Silvopastoral Systems and more energy efficiency demonstrate the potential of organic livestock farms for contributing to more sustainable production as compared to conventional livestock production.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jose Nahed Toral, Valdivieso-Pérez I.A., & Grande-Cano, D. (2024). Theoretical and practical propositions for more sustainable livestock production. Advances in Food Production, Processing, and Nutrition, 001–007. https://doi.org/10.17352/afppn.000002
Articles

Copyright (c) 2024 Nahed-Toral J, et al.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.

We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.

Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]

Explanation

'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.

Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.

With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:

License Name

Permission to read and download

Permission to display in a repository

Permission to translate

Commercial uses of manuscript

CC BY 4.0

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.

ten Napel J, van der Veen AA, Oosting SJ, Koerkamp PWGG. A conceptual approach to design livestock production systems for robustness to enhance sustainability. Livest Sci. 2011; 139:150–160.

CONANP. Ganadería Sustentable. Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas. Gobierno de México. 2018. (accessed February 9, 2024)

ECURED. Sustainable livestock farming. 2023. https://www.ecured.cu/Ganadería_sostenible (accessed February 12, 2024)

Valdivieso-Pérez IA, Nahed-Toral J, Piñeiro-Vázquez A, Guevara-Hernández F, Jiménez-Ferrer G, Grande-Cano D. Potential for organic conversion and energy efficiency of conventional livestock production in a humid tropical region of Mexico. J Clean Prod. 2019 Dec 20;241: 1-17; 118354. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118354.

Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar P, Castel V, Rosales M, De Haan C. Livestock’s Long Shadow. Environmental Issues and Options. Initiative for Livestock, Environment, and Development. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2006. Available from: https://www.fao.org/4/a0701e/a0701e00.htm.

CONAFOR. Servicios ambientales. Comisión Nacional Forestal. 2012. http://www.conafor.gob.mx/portal/index.php/temas-foresta¬les/servicios-ambientales

Georgescu-Roegen N. Energy and economic myths. South Econ J. 1975;41:347-381. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1056148.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. IPCC; 2011.

International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM). The principles of organic agriculture. https://www.ifoam.bio/en/organic-landmarks/principles-organic-agriculture; 2018.

Nahed-Toral J, Sanchez-Muñoz B, Mena Y, Ruiz-Rojas J, Aguilar-Jimenez R, Castel J, De Asis-Ruiz F, Orantes-Zebadua M, Manzur-Cruz A, Cruz-Lopez J, Delgadillo-Puga C. Feasibility of converting agrosilvopastoral systems of dairy cattle to the organic production model in southeastern Mexico. J Clean Prod. 2013 Feb 1;43:136-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.019.

Nahed-Toral J, Guevara-Hernández F, Pama-García JM, López-Tecpoyotl ZG, Sánchez-Muñoz B, Ruíz-Rojas JL, Aguilar-Jiménez R, Parra-Vázquez MR. Innovation for the sustainable development of livestock farming through silvopastoral systems and organic production in the southern border. In: García Ochoa, R., León-Cortés, J.L. (Coord.). North-South: Border Dialogues. The Northern Border College. Mexico. 2019; 103-133.

López-Ortiz S. What is sustainable livestock farming?. In: Halffter G, Cruz M, Huerta C, editors. Sustainable livestock farming in the Gulf of Mexico. Xalapa, Veracruz, México: Institute of Ecology. 2016; 65-73.

Varijakshapanicker P, Mckune S, Miller L, Hendrickx S, Balehegn M, Dahl GE, Adesogan AT. Sustainable livestock systems to improve human health, nutrition, and economic status. Anim Front. 2019 Sep 28;9(4):39-50. doi: 10.1093/af/vfz041. PMID: 32002273; PMCID: PMC6951866.

Agrilinks. The importance of livestock and sustainable production systems. Agrilinks. 2019. (accessed 3 February 2024)

Crespo HC, Rosales CM, Escobar F, Gámez AL. What is meant by sustainable livestock farming? In C.C. Huerta and R.M. Cruz (Compilers), Towards Sustainable and Biodiversity-Friendly Livestock Farming. Case Study: Xico, Veracruz. Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico: Institute of Ecology. 2016; 21-29.

Breuer B, Martin L, Wierig M, Saggau E. Drivers of change and development in the EU livestock sector. Collaborative Working Group on Sustainable Animal Production. Federal Office for Agriculture and Food. Bonn, Germany. 2019.

CEDRSSA. Livestock policy and sustainable livestock farming. Center for Studies for Sustainable Rural Development and Food Sovereignty, Chamber of Deputies. LXIV Legislature. Mexico City. 2020.

BIOPASOS. Sustainable Livestock. Regional Platform for Sustainable Livestock, Biodiversity and Climate Change. 2022. https://www.biopasos.com/plataformaBioPaSOS/ganaderia-sostenible.html (accessed December 25, 2023)

Cabezas JC, Benítez AC, Odio F, Proaño R, Maldonado G. Sustainable livestock farming: practices guide for the Northwest of Pichincha. EcoAndes Project, Andean Forests Program, CONDESAN. Quito, Ecuador: 2019.

Cruz M, de Oca ME. Towards sustainable livestock farming In M. Cruz and C. Huerta. (Comps.), Towards sustainable livestock farming. Case Study, Jilotepec, Veracruz. Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico: Institute of Ecology. 2013; 26-34.

Hollmann M. Sustainable Animal Agriculture. Michigan State University, Department of Animal Science. Michigan State University Extension, USA. 2007. https://www.canr.msu.edu/uploads/236/29130/Sustainable_Animal_Agriculture.pdf (accessed 18 February 2023)

Beede DK. Animal Agriculture: How Can It Be Sustainable in the Future? In: Sustainable Animal Agriculture. Kebreab, E. (Ed.). CAB International. Oxfordshire, UK. 2013; 284-311.

Kerr S. Sustainable livestock production, Part 1. Oregon State University. 2008. https://smallfarms.oregonstate.edu/sustainable-livestock-production-part-1 (accessed 3 January 2023)

International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM). One Earth, Many Minds, IFOAM Head Office, Bonn. 2009.

Mena-Guerrero Y, Ruiz-Morales F, Castel-Genis J, Ligero-Casado M. Proximity to the organic model of dairy goat systems in the Andalusian mountains (Spain). Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosyst. 2009; 11:69–73. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93913000015

Zepeda-Cancino, R, Velasco-Zebadúa, ME, Nahed-Toral J, Hernández A, Martínez-Tinajero J. Adoption of silvopastoral systems and sociocultural context of farmers: support and limiting factors. Rev. Mex. de Cienc. Pecuarias. 2016; 7:471–488.

Nauta WJ, Baars T, Bovenhuis H. Converting to organic dairy farming: Consequences for production, somatic cell scores and calving interval of first parity Holstein cows. Livest. Sci. 2006; 99:185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.06.013

Von Borell E, Sorensen JT. Organic livestock production in Europe: aims, rules and trends with special emphasis on animal health and welfare. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2004; 90:3- 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.07.003

Hersleth M, Næs T, Rødbotten M, Lind V, Monteleone E. Lamb meat--importance of origin and grazing system for Italian and Norwegian consumers. Meat Sci. 2012 Apr;90(4):899-907. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.11.030. Epub 2011 Nov 28. PMID: 22172765.

EURLex. Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007. 2007. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/848/oj (accessed 25 December 2018)

Nahed TJ, Sánchez-Muñoz B, Mena Y, Ruiz-Rojas J, Aguilar-Jimenez R, Castel J. Ruiz MF, Orantes-Zebadua A, Manzur-Cruz J, Cruz-Lopez J. Feasibility of converting agrosilvopastoral systems of dairy cattle to the organic production model in southeastern Mexico. J. Clean. Prod. 2013; 43:136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.019

Nahed TJ, Guevara-Hernández F, Palma-García JM, López-Tecpoyotl ZG, Sánchez-Muñoz JB, Ruíz-Rojas JL, Aguilar-Jiménez JR, Parra-Vázquez MR. Innovation for the development of livestock through silvopastoral systems and organic production in the southern border, in: García, R., León, J. (Eds.). Norte-sur. Border Dialogues, The College of the Northern Border, México. 2019; 103-134.

Nahed TJ, González-Pineda S, Grande D, Aguilar R, Sánchez B, Ruiz J, Guevara-Hernández F, León N, Trujillo-Vázquez R, Parra-Vázquez M. Evaluating sustainability of conventional and organic dairy cattle production units in the Zoque Region of Chiapas, Mexico. Agroecol. Sust. Food. 2018; 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2018.1534302

Mena Y, Nahed J, Ruiz FA, Sánchez-Muñoz JB, Ruiz-Rojas JL, Castel JM. Evaluating mountain goat dairy systems for conversion to the organic model, using a multicriteria method. Animal. 2012 Apr;6(4):693-703. doi: 10.1017/S175173111100190X. PMID: 22436287.

Solorio FJ, Basu SK, Sarabia L, Ayala A, Ramírez L, Aguilar C, Erales JA, Ku JC, Wright J. The Potential of Silvopastoral Systems for Milk and Meat Organic Production in the Tropics, in: Nandwani, D. (Ed.), Organic Farming for Sustainable Agriculture, Sustainable Development and Biodiversity, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland. 2016; 169-183.

Ripoll-Bosch R, Díez-Unquera B, Ruiz R, Villalba D, Molina E, Joy M, Olaizola A, Bernués A. An integrated sustainability assessment of mediterranean sheep farms with different degrees of intensification. Agric. Syst. 2012; 105:46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2011.10.003

Escribano A, Gaspar P, Mesías F, Escribano M, Pulido F. Comparative sustainability assessment of extensive beef cattle farms in a high nature value agroforestry system, in: Squires, V.R. (Ed.), Rangeland ecology, management and conservations benefits, Nova Publishers, New York. 2015; 65–85.

Follett R, Reed D. Soil Carbon Sequestration in Grazing Lands: Societal Benefits and Policy Implications. Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 2010; 63:4-15. https://doi.org/10.2111/08-225.1

Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G. Confronting climate change through livestock production – A global evaluation of emissions and opportunities for mitigation, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome. 2013.

McGahey D, Davies J, Hagelberg N, Ouedraogo R. Pastoralism and the Green Economy: a natural nexus?, International Union for Conservation of Nature; United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi. 2014.

Alonso J. Silvopastoral systems and their contribution to the environment. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science. 2014; 45:107-114.

Yadav A, Gendley MK, Sahu J, Patel PK, Chandrakar K, Dubey A. Silvopastoral system: A prototype of livestock agroforestry. J. Pharm. Innov. 2019; 8:76-82.

Shibu J. Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agroforest. Syst. 2009; 76:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9229-7

Garrity DP. Agroforestry and the achievement of the Millenium development goals. Agrofor. Syst. 2004; 61:5–17. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2424-1_1

Aguilar R, Nahed TJ, Parra M, García L, Ferguson B. Livelihoods and approximation of livestock systems to organic production standards in Villaflores, Chiapas, Mexico. Avances en Investigación Agropecuaria. 2012; 16:21-51.

Bertalanffy LV. General theory of the systems, Fondo de Cultura Económica, Mexico. 1976.

Pimentel D, Hurd LE, Bellotti AC, Forster MJ, Oka IN, Sholes OD, Whitman RJ. Food production and the energy crisis. Science. 1973 Nov 2;182(4111):443-9. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4111.443. PMID: 17832454.

Funes-Monzote F, Monzote M, Lantiga E, van Keulen,H. Conversion of specialised dairy farming systems into sustainable mixed farming systems in Cuba. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2009; 11:765-783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-008-9142-7.

Guevara F, Rodríguez LA, Ocaña MJ, Cruz JO, Pinto R, La O A, Gómez-Castro H, Ortiz-Pérez R. Maize stover in the relationship of maize-growing and cattle production in the dry tropics of Chiapas, Mexico, México. Arch. Latinoam. Prod. Anim. 2014; 22:37-42.

Perez-Neira D, Soler M, Fernandez X. Energy indicators for organic livestock production: a case study from Andalucia, Southern Spain. Agroecol. Sust. Food. 2014; 38:317-335. http://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2013.833154

Vigne M, Vayssières J, Lecomte P, Peyraud JL. Evaluating the ability of current energy use assessment methods to study contrasting livestock production systems. J Environ Manage. 2012 Dec 15;112:199-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.017. Epub 2012 Aug 24. PMID: 22926778.

Odum HT, Odum EC. Man and nature: Energy Foundations, Omega, Barcelona. 1981.

Pimentel D. Impacts of Organic Farming on the Efficiency of Energy Use in Agriculture. An Organic Center State of Science Review, The Organic Center, Cornell University, Ithaca. 2006.

Bertilsson G, Kirchmann H, Bergström L. Energy Analysis of Organic and Conventional Agricultural Systems, in: Kirchmann, H., Bergström, L. (Eds.), Organic Crop Production – Ambitions and Limitations, Springer, The Netherlands. 2008; 173-188.

Jiménez G, Nahed J, Soto L, Márquez C, Reyes F, Ruíz M, De Paz J, Hernández L. Agroforestry in the Lacandon Jungle, in: Palma, J., Nahed, J., Sanginés, L. (Eds.), Alternatives for sustainable livestock reconversion, The College of the Southern Frontier, Salvador Zubirán National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Mexico. 2011; 127-150.

Cook SM, Khan ZR, Pickett JA. The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management. Annu Rev Entomol. 2007;52:375-400. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091407. PMID: 16968206.

Woods J, Williams A, Hughes JK, Black M, Murphy R. Energy and the food system. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 27;365(1554):2991-3006. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0172. PMID: 20713398; PMCID: PMC2935130.

Thomassen MA, van Calker KJ, Smits MCJ, Iepema GL, de Boer I. Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic milk production in the Netherlands. Agr. Syst. 2008; 96:95-107.

Aguilar-Jiménez JR, Nahed-Toral J, Parra-Vázquez MR, Guevara-Hernández F, Pat-Fernández LA. Adaptability of Cattle-Raising to Multiple Stressorsin the Dry Tropics of Chiapas, Mexico. Sustainability. 1919.; 11:1-21. https://doi:10.3390/su11071955

Nahed TJ, López-Tecpoyotl ZG, Aguilar JJR, Grande CD, Delgadillo PC. Compliance of Goat Farming under Extensive Grazing with the Organic Standards and Its Contribution to Sustainability in Puebla, Mexico. Sustainability. 2021;13:1-25. doi: 10.3390/su13116293.

Nahed-Toral J, Sanchez-Muñoz B, Mena Y, Ruiz-Rojas J, Aguilar-Jimenez R, Castel J, De Asis-Ruiz F, Orantes-Zebadua M, Manzur-Cruz A, Cruz-Lopez J, Delgadillo-Puga C. Feasibility of converting agrosilvopastoral systems of dairy cattle to the organic production model in southeastern Mexico. J Clean Prod. 2013 Feb 1;43:136-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.019.

Trenti-Very CL, González-Jácome A, Landín López AL, Mariaca-Méndez R, Jiménez-Ferrer G, Nahed Toral J. Caprinoculture, Environment and Peasant Economy: An Analysis of Family Livestock Systems at San Luis Potosi's Semi-desert. Rev El Colegio San Luis. 2021;11(22):5-34.